- Data Central
- Bridge Inspections
- U.S.
- Washington
- Pierce
- SB SR16 RMP CENTER over SR 16 RAMP
Search
Bridge Inspections
Map
Good condition- Meets minimum tolerable limits
- Needs repair or corrective action
- Closed
- Report not available
Good condition
Meets minimum tolerable limits
Needs repair or corrective action
Closed
Report not availableBasic Information
| County, State: | Pierce County, Washington | Structure Number: | 0016767A0000000 |
| Maintenance Responsibility: | State Highway Agency | Ownership: | State Highway Agency |
| Facility Carried By Structure: | SB SR16 RMP CENTER | Features Intersected (Location): | SR 16 RAMP (1.9 N JCT I-5) |
| Year Built: | 2006 | Year Reconstructed: | N/A |
| Average Daily Traffic (Year): | 12,683 (2019) with 6% truck traffic | Future Average Daily Traffic (Year): | 18,364 (2039) |
NBI Report
| NBI Bridge Condition | Good |
| Inspection Date (Inspection Frequency): | May 2021 (Every 24 Months) |
| Structural Evaluation: | 8: Equal to present desirable criteria |
| Deck Geometry | 9: Superior to present desirable criteria |
| Underclear/Vertical and Horizontal: | 4: Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is |
| Deck | 7: GOOD CONDITION - some minor problems. |
| Superstructure | 8: VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. |
| Substructure | 8: VERY GOOD CONDITION - no problems noted. |
| Channel/Channel Protection | N: Not applicable. Use when bridge is not over a waterway (channel). |
| Culverts | N: Not applicable. Use if structure is not a culvert. |
| Waterway Adequacy: | N: Bridge not over a waterway. |
| Approach Roadway Alignment: | 8: Equal to present desirable criteria |
| Bridge Posting | No posting required: Equal to or above legal loads |
| Scour Critical Bridges: | N: Bridge not over waterway. |
| Bridge Railings: | 1: Inspected feature meets currently acceptable standards. |
| Transitions: | 1: Inspected feature meets currently acceptable standards. |
| Approach Guardrail: | 1: Inspected feature meets currently acceptable standards. |
| Approach Guardrail Ends: | 1: Inspected feature meets currently acceptable standards. |
| Historical significance: | 4: Historical significance is not determinable at this time. |
| Type of Work Proposed: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. |
| Work Done By: | Work to be done by contract |
| Length of Structure Improvement: | None meters |
| Bridge Improvement Cost | $2,135,000 |
| Roadway Improvement Cost | $427,000 |
| Total Project Cost | $4,270,000 |
| Year of Improvement Cost Estimate: | 2022 |
More Information
| Designated Level of Service | Ramp, Wye, Connector, etc. |
| Route Number: | 00016 |
| Inventory Route/Min Vert Clearance: | 6.78 meters |
| Kilometerpoint: | 3.138 |
| Bypass/Detour Length: | 2.00 kilometers |
| Toll: | On free road. The structure is toll-free and carries a toll-free highway. |
| Functional Class Of Inventory Route: | Urban: Principal Arterial - Other Freeways or Expressways |
| Lanes On Structure: | 1 |
| Lanes Under Structure: | 8 |
| Design Load: | A |
| Approach Roadway Width: | None meters |
| Bridge Median: | No median |
| Skew: | 0 |
| Structure Flared: | No flare |
| Navigation Control: | Not applicable, no waterway. |
| Structure Open/Posted/Closed: | Open, no restriction |
| Type of Service On Bridge: | Highway |
| Type of Service Under Bridge: | Highway, with or without pedestrian |
| Kind of Material/Design: | Steel continuous |
| Type of Design/Construction: | Stringer/Multi-beam or Girder |
| Kind of Material/Design: | Other |
| Type of Design/Construction: | Other |
| Number Of Spans In Main Unit: | 2 |
| Number Of Approach Spans: | 0 |
| Inventory Route Total Horizontal Clearance: | 20.40 meters |
| Length Of Maximum Span: | 51.80 meters |
| Structure Length: | None meters |
| Left Curb/Sidewalk Width: | None meters |
| Right Curb/Sidewalk Width: | None meters |
| Bridge Roadway Width Curb-To-Curb: | None meters |
| Deck Width/Out-To-Out: | None meters |
| Minimum Vertical Clearance Over Bridge Roadway: | None meters |
| Reference Feature: | Highway beneath structure |
| Minimum Vertical Under Clearance: | None meters |
| Reference Feature: | Highway beneath structure |
| Minimum Lateral Under Clearance: | None meters |
| Minimum Lateral Under Clearance On Left: | None meters |
| Operating Rating (Method): | None metric tons(Load Factor (LF)) |
| Inventory Rating (Methon): | None metric tons (Load Factor (LF)) |
| STRAHNET Highway Designation: | The inventory route is not a STRAHNET route. |
| Parallel Structure Designation: | No parallel structure exists. |
| Direction Of Traffic: | 1-way traffic |
| Highway System Of Inventory Route: | Inventory Route is on the NHS |
| Federal Lands Highways: | Not applicable |
| Deck Structure Type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place |
| Type of Wearing Surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) |
| Type of Membrane: | None |
| Deck Protection: | Epoxy Coated Reinforcing |
| Designated National Network: | The inventory route is not part of the national network for trucks. |
| NBIS Bridge Length: | Yes |
| Minimum Navigation Vertical: | None meters |
'; popupContent += '
| '+feature.properties.pctnfc+'% | of bridges need repair or closed |
'; popupContent += '
| Total # of Bridges | '+feature.properties.total+' | |
| Bridges need repair or corrective action | '+feature.properties.nf+' | |
| Closed | '+feature.properties.cl+' | |
| Number | Percent | |
| Rated Poor by USDOT | '+feature.properties.poor+' | '+feature.properties.pctpoor+' |
| Structurally Deficient | '+feature.properties.sd+' | '+feature.properties.pctsd+' |
'; popupContent += '
More
'; return popupContent; }//{"type": "Feature","properties":{"gid":"01001", "name":"Autauga County, AL", "slug":"autauga", "stslug":"alabama", "year":"2018", "total":"117", "nf":"14", "nfc":"14", "cl":"0", "pctnfc":"11.97","poor":"4","pctpoor":"3.42","sd":"4","pctsd":"3.42","fo":"16","pctfo":"13.68","fc":"#e6b414","pc":"#00f014"},"geometry": {"type": "MultiPolygon","coordinates":US01001}} function onBridgeFeature(feature) { if(feature.properties.ost == 'good'){var ost = 'Good/Fair';} else if(feature.properties.ost == 'poor'){var ost = 'Meets minimum tolerable limits';} else if(feature.properties.ost == 'repair'){var ost = 'Needs repair or corrective action';} else if(feature.properties.ost == 'closed'){var ost = 'Closed';} else if(feature.properties.ost == 'N/A'){var ost = 'Report Not Available';}; if(feature.properties.bc == 'F'){var bc = 'Fair';} else if(feature.properties.bc == 'G'){var bc = 'Good';} else if(feature.properties.bc == 'P'){var bc = 'Poor';}; if(feature.properties.sd == 'y'){var sd = '
Structurally Deficient';} else { var sd = '';} if(feature.properties.fo == 'y'){var fo = '
Functionally Obsolete';} else { var fo = '';} var popupContent = "";// var popupContent = "
I started out as a GeoJSON " + feature.geometry.type + ", but now I'm a Leaflet vector!
"; popupContent += '
'+feature.properties.name+'
'; popupContent += '
| NBI Inspection Date | '+feature.properties.idte+' |
| Overall Status | '+ost+' |
| NBI Bridge Condition | '+bc+sd+fo+' |
| Sufficiency Rating | '+feature.properties.sr+' |
| Structural Evaluation | '+feature.properties.item67+': '+feature.properties.stru+' |
| Deck Geometry | '+feature.properties.item68+': '+feature.properties.deck+' |
'; popupContent += '
More
'; return popupContent; } var CntyBridgesJSON = { "type": "FeatureCollection", "features":BridgeJSONData };// var CntyBridgesJSON = { "type": "FeatureCollection", "features":[] };mapboxgl.accessToken = 'pk.eyJ1IjoieXB5dW4iLCJhIjoiY2oxcW4ybWhxMDBkMjJxcGVhbDV5cnpzYyJ9.oFQSnOc57xCR7A51OR6-3w'; //ck0flqufl2k1x1cpmupm5sl2yvar map = new mapboxgl.Map({container: 'bridgeMap', style: 'mapbox://styles/ypyun/cj83a8ga5abkq2sqpivw3nrzg',center: [-122.49783333,47.23561111], zoom: 14, attributionControl: false, });map.addControl(new mapboxgl.AttributionControl({ compact: false, customAttribution:['Map Icons Collection'] })); var STLINE = {"type":"FeatureCollection", "features":[ {"type":"Feature","properties":{"GEO_ID":"53053","NAME":"State","VAL":0,"VALstr":"","VALper":"","FC":"#FFF",},"geometry":{"type":"MultiPolygon","coordinates":US53053 }}, ]}; // ptype detailmap.on('style.load', function() { var layers = map.getStyle().layers; var firstSymbolId; for (var i = 0; i < layers.length; i++) { if (layers[i].type === 'symbol') { firstSymbolId = layers[i].id; break; } } map.addSource('bridges', {type: 'geojson', data: CntyBridgesJSON }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_green.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('green', image); }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_yellow.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('yellow', image); }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_red.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('red', image); }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_black.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('black', image); }); map.loadImage('/static/markers/bridges/bridge_white.png', function(error, image) {if (error) throw error; map.addImage('white', image); }); map.addLayer({"id": "bridge_point", "type": "symbol", "source": "bridges", "filter":["all", ["==","m","y"]], "layout": {"visibility":"visible", "icon-image": '{grade}', 'icon-allow-overlap':true},}); map.on('click', "bridge_point", function (e) {new mapboxgl.Popup({ offset: 14 }).setLngLat(e.lngLat).setHTML(onBridgeFeature(e.features[0])).addTo(map);}); map.on('mouseenter', "bridge_point", function () {map.getCanvas().style.cursor = 'pointer'; }); map.on('mouseleave', "bridge_point", function () {map.getCanvas().style.cursor = '';}); map.addLayer({ "id": "stline", "type": "line", "source": { "type": "geojson", "data":STLINE }, "paint": {'line-color':"#333", 'line-opacity':0.9, 'line-width': 2.0 }},firstSymbolId);}); map.addControl(new mapboxgl.NavigationControl(), 'top-left');map.flyTo({ center: [-122.49783333,47.23561111], zoom: 14, speed: 3, curve: 1, easing: function (t) { return t; } });
